This simple costume won me "Funniest Costume" at the Lionsgate Costume Contest. I provided the following description: "Lead-Based painted Chinese-American import."
$50 Gift Card to P.F. Chang's
| 0 comments |
| 1 comments |
| 1 comments |
| 1 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 1 comments |
The overall sentiment during the meeting was extremely positive. The company has grown immensely in the first year I've been here, and has grown even more substantially since Jon Feltheimer became the CEO of the company in 2000. I can say with absolutely honesty that this company is great to work for. While the pay is still a little less than some of our competitors, the benefits are incredible, and the potential for the future is through the roof.
Below I have included the first page of an article from TheStreet.com that came out today. Here's a nice quote from the 3rd page of the article:
P.S. Even in a recession, this stock could still make you money! Cramer believes this stock is undervalued, recession-proof and poised to deliver +30% in the next year, regardless of the state of the economy.
------------------------------------------
Lions Gate Makes New Charge
By Nat Worden
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
10/1/2007 12:57 PM EDT
If you want to invest in the movie business, never mind the studios behind Spiderman, Shrek and Pirates of the Caribbean. Look to the little lion instead.
Wall Street has been mesmerized by the record-breaking summer blockbuster season powered by big-budget hits from the media titans like Disney (DIS - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating), Viacom (VIA - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating) and News Corp. (NWS - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating).
When it comes to their stock prices, however, the success of these franchise favorites too often gets buried within the consolidated results of sprawling conglomerates coping with a host of problems in other businesses.
That hasn't been an issue at Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating), one of the last remaining pure-plays on filmed entertainment. Lions Gate is known for making cheap movies with a lower profile and turning them into highly profitable offerings, but in recent months something went wrong.
While its huge media rivals enjoyed the biggest summer in box office history, Lions Gate suffered a losing streak for which it was punished by investors. Its films -- like Slow Burn, The Condemned, Delta Farce, Bug, Hostel 2 and Bratz -- fizzled. Its stock shed about 15% over the course of the season.
"We didn't put our best foot forward this summer," conceded Michael Burns, vice chairman with Lions Gate, at a recent media conference in New York City.
On a conference call following its first-quarter earnings release in early August, Burns estimated those six films will wind up costing the studio just $15 million. Meanwhile, he predicted the next batch of movies would pick up the slack and give the company its strongest fiscal year ever in 2008, with a domestic box office target of $400 million.
So far so good. The company's offbeat comedy starring Jessica Alba and Dana Cook, Good Luck Chuck, in which Lions Gate only invested $19 million, opened last month and brought in a respectable $14 million at the box office in its debut. That exceeded expectations for Oppenheimer analyst Thomas Eagan, who predicts the company will earn $12 million to $14 million on the title.
Good Luck Chuck followed the strong opening of Lions Gate's Western remake 3:10 to Yuma. That movie led the box office in its early September debut with $14.1 million and continues to be strong. In August, the company released the action movie War, another solid performer.
Page 1 2 3 NEXT PAGE >
----------------------------------| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
Unlike so many other electronic artists who basically mix their album tracks together like a DJ, Daft Punk completely de-constructs the tracks from their three studio albums, creating a brand new soundscape that builds up huge climaxes using portions of their songs which tease the crowd just long enough before dropping into full blown dance floor burners. This allows them to cover a lot of ground, using elements of dozens of songs without ever playing any album track in its original form. The ecstatic crowd of around 15,000 people were all dancing, and most were literally jumping up and down at various times throughout the show.
Here's another review in the Los Angeles Times.
Full live set @ Coachella on 04.29.06 (.mp3)
A great article about my two favorite robot humans.
Here are some video highlights that I found on YouTube.
I've also added a variety of other longer sequences and various angles from the show in the videos below.
Opening Sequence
I was probably about 20-25 feet in front of where this video was taken.
Helmets very visible... TELEVISION, RULES THE NATION
Da Funk! (This posters blog has parts of the concert in 21 YouTube videos.)
Robot Heaven
Video from another angle PRIME TIME OF YOUR LIFE
Here is another video with the entire Encore peformance. SWEET!
If I find any better quality videos I may add them.
| 1 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 0 comments |
| 1 comments |
| 0 comments |
Bloggers Who Criticize Government May Face Prison (Original Article)
Bill would allow rounding up and imprisoning of non-registered political writers
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Thursday, January 18, 2007
You'd be forgiven for thinking that it was some new restriction on free speech in Communist China. But it isn't. The U.S. Government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress in the latest astounding attack on the internet and the First Amendment.
Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman of GrassrootsFreedom.com, a website dedicated to fighting efforts to silence grassroots movements, states:
"Section 220 of S. 1, the lobbying reform bill currently before the Senate, would require grassroots causes, even bloggers, who communicate to 500 or more members of the public on policy matters, to register and report quarterly to Congress the same as the big K Street lobbyists. Section 220 would amend existing lobbying reporting law by creating the most expansive intrusion on First Amendment rights ever. For the first time in history, critics of Congress will need to register and report with Congress itself."
In other words Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats may redefine the meaning of lobbying in order that political communications to and even between citizens falls under the same legislation. Under current law any 'lobbyist" who 'knowingly and willingly fails to file or report." quarterly to the government faces criminal charges including a possible jail term of up to one year. The amendment is currently on hold.
This latest attack on bloggers comes hot on the heels of Republican Senator John McCain's proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards.
McCain's proposal is presented under the banner of saving children from sexual predators and encourages informants to shop website owners to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, who then pass the information on to the relevant police authorities.
Despite a total lack of any evidence that children are being victimized en mass by bloggers or people who leave comments on blog sites, it seems likely that the proposal will become legislation in some form. It is well known that McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned.
In recent months, a chorus of propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and further lead it down a path of strict control has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs: During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last November, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an "adversarial and ugly climate."
- The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.
- The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.
- In a speech last month, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills." Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.
- A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet file sharing of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government.
- A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting the trap door for the destruction of the Internet as we know it and the end of alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply linking to other websites is breach of copyright and piracy.
- The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.
- The EU also recently proposed legislation that would prevent users from uploading any form of video without a license.
- We have also previously exposed how moves are afoot to clamp down on internet neutrality and even to designate a highly restricted new form of the internet known as Internet 2. Make no mistake, the internet, one of the greatest outposts of free speech ever created is under constant attack by powerful people who cannot operate within a society where information flows freely and unhindered. All these moves mimic stories we hear every week out of State Controlled Communist China, where the internet is strictly regulated and virtually exists as its own entity away from the rest of the web.
The phrases "Chinese government" and "Mao Zedong" have even been censored on China's official Web sites because they are "Sensitive phrases". Are we to allow our supposedly Democratic governments to implement the same type of restrictive policies here? Under section 220 of the lobbying reform bill, Infowars.net could be required to seek a license in order to bring this information to you. IF we were granted a license we would then have to report our activities to the government four times per year in order to bring you this information. Does that sound more like free speech or more like totalitarianism?
| 0 comments |
| 2 comments |
| 0 comments |
I think, therefore I think I am | Powered by Blogger | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Designed by MB Web Design | XML Coded By Cahayabiru.com